Columbus it s okay the credit for being the first to soil on these shores. Does he deserve it? Bettmann/Corbis hide caption

You are watching: Africa and the discovery of america


Columbus gets the credit transaction for being the first to floor on these shores. Does he deserve it?


Columbus Competitors: The Theories

Was Christopher Columbus first? A organize of competing theories speak no. Right here are a couple of of the much more prominent ones:Sixth Century — irish Monks: This "theory" is actually much more of a legend. A sixth-century irish monk called Saint Brendan supposedly cruised to north America on a currach — a wood-framed watercraft covered with animal skin. His alleged trip is detailed in the ancient annals of Ireland. Brendan to be a genuine historical number who traveled generally in Europe. But there is no evidence that he ever made landfall in phibìc America. In 1976, writer Tim Severin collection out come prove that such a trip was possible. Severin built the Brendan, specific replica that a sixth-century currach, and sailed follow me a route defined by the travel monks. He at some point landed in Canada.10th Century — The Vikings: The Vikings" beforehand expeditions to north America room well documented and also accepted together historical fact by many scholars. Around the year 1000 A.D., the Viking explorer Leif Erikson, boy of Erik the Red, cruised to a place he referred to as "Vinland," in what is now the Canadian district of Newfoundland. Erikson and his crew didn"t stay long — just a couple of years — before returning to Greenland. Connections with indigenous North americans were explained as hostile. This much had long been known from the icelandic sagas. Yet until 1960, there to be no evidence of Erikson"s American sojourns. The year, Norwegian explorer Helge Ingstad and also his wife, archaeologist Anne Stine Ingstad, unearthed an old Norse settlement. Throughout the following seven years, the Ingstads and also an international team of excavators exposed the structures of eight separate buildings. In 1969, conference designated Oct. 9 together "Leif Erikson Day." 15th Century — The Chinese: This concept is espoused by a small group of scholars and also amateur historians led through Gavin Menzies, a retired British navy officer. The asserts the a Muslim-Chinese eunuch-mariner indigenous the Ming Dynasty uncovered America — 71 years before Columbus. Zheng He was a real historic figure, who commanded a large armada the wooden cruising vessels in the at an early stage 15th century. He explored Southeast Asia, India and the east shore of Africa using navigational methods that were, at the time, cut edge. But Menzies, in his best-selling 2003 book, 1421: The Year China uncovered America, asserts the Zheng He sailed to the east coast of the unified States, and also may have established settlements in south America. Menzies based his theory on proof from old shipwrecks, Chinese and also European maps, and accounts written by navigators that the time. Menzies" scholarship, though, has been referred to as into question. Countless of his cases are presented "without a piece of proof," says chronicler Robert Finlay, writing in the Journal of people History. Indeed, most historians say the "China first" theory is complete of holes. — Eric Weiner

Want to recognize more? review an excerpt indigenous "Who to be First?"

Who uncovered America?

For many of us, the answer to that question is straightforward: Christopher Columbus. That"s what us were taught in school and also that is why we celebrate Columbus Day. Yet it is much from clear-cut.

There are different theories around who got here first — part well-documented, rather much much more flimsy in their scholarship. Author Russell liberty explores the miscellaneous contenders because that the title of "first" in his new book, Who to be First? discovering the Americas. He shares his insights through

When you began this project, were you choose the rest of us? did you believe that Christopher Columbus found America and that to be it, finish of story?

I was vaguely mindful of the Vikings. But really, what incited my interest was a publication called 1421: The Year China uncovered America. That book has been largely debunked, but what is clear is the there have actually been successive waves of immigrant to the west Hemisphere native outside. Wherein they come from and when lock arrived and how they acquired here — that"s all still speculative.

Tell me about the irish Monks who supposedly predated even the Vikings.

See more: Office Space What Would You Do With A Million Dollars, Ajay Naidu As Samir

That falls into the kingdom of legend. However it"s possible that lock came throughout the phibìc Sea, to what is now Newfoundland, prior to the Vikings. No one knows because that sure.

And the Vikings?

That is fine established. I went to the archeological website at the northern tip the Newfoundland. There is no question about it. It has been absolutely determined the the Vikings were there for about 10 years — specifics Leif Erikson and also his extended family.

Is there any physical evidence that stays today?

Yes, the stays of their houses, of their settlement. There to be an archeological destruction that lasted six or seven years, and also then they reconstructed the settlement about 100 yards away.

What did Leif Erikson make of this new World?

It was complete of exorbitant resources: timber and also grapes. Coming from Greenland, together he did, which had no hardwood or grapes to make wine, this were two priceless discoveries. That"s why the Vikings referred to as it "Vinland" or alcohol Land.

So if it was so wonderful, why didn"t the Vikings continue to be longer?

The ind didn"t desire them come stay. The very first encounter was as soon as the Vikings came across 10 Indians acquisition naps under your overturned canoes — and the Vikings eliminated them. That did not collection up a very good mutual relationship. There were some attempts at trading, but the Vikings felt rather menaced and also outnumbered, and also the ind did not appreciate your presence. The Vikings did go back to North America, yet only because that trading. Lock never worked out again.

What about the "China first" theory? Is there any type of evidence to support the notion that Chinese mariners collection foot in America before Columbus?

There is credible proof that a Chinese fleet went as much as the shore of Africa, in contemporary Kenya. It to be the largest maritime fleet in the world, under the command the Zheng He, a favourite of the emperor. Even if it is the fleet went around the horn the Africa and also then throughout the Atlantic is speculative. The theory has been commonly shot down by experts in the field. Over there is no real evidence. The author uses a take bag the evidence, few of it is suggestive and also some of that is ridiculous.

So if Columbus wasn"t first, why does he get every one of the credit?

He opened up America come Europe, which was the expansionist strength at the time. He was the one who made it possible for castle to overcome the western Hemisphere — and also to bring with castle the conditions that reportedly wiped out 90 percent of the population. He wasn"t the very first (and neither were the Vikings) — the is a very Euro-centric view. There to be millions of civilization here already, and so your ancestors must have actually been the first.

What did you find most surprising in researching this book?

For one thing, the longevity of settlement of the western Hemisphere — 20,000 years, in ~ least. Ns don"t think it"s silly, this quest for answers of who gained here first. You always want to know what happened before you. It" a human instinct to understand where you came from and what conduct you. How did they gain here? who were they? The reality that us don"t know for sure makes it fairly fascinating.