Main Menu

about sign up with or offer separation, personal, instance Membership occasions service Member events Policy locations initiatives

Creates a brand-new Housing and breakthrough Commission come oversee the city’s Housing and also Community advance and Economic and Workforce development agencies.

You are watching: Prop m san francisco


What the Measure Would Do

Proposition M is a charter amendment the would establish a brand-new Housing and development Commission. The commission would certainly oversee a brand-new Department the Housing and also Community breakthrough (currently the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development) and also a new Department the Economic and also Workforce development (currently the Office of Economic and also Workforce Development).

The commission would be comprised of seven members, 3 appointed by the market (confirmed by the plank of Supervisors), three appointed through the board of Supervisors (but not evidenced by the mayor) and one appointed by the controller. Among the mayoral appointees would be compelled to have actually experience in affordable housing or community development; one more would be forced to have actually experience in supportive housing or homelessnessprevention services. One of the plank of Supervisors’ appointees would certainly be required to have experience in affordable real estate or neighborhood development. The controller’s appointee would be forced to have actually experience in finance. Members would certainly be appointed because that four-year terms and be permitted to serve two consecutive terms.

The board of directors would have actually the power to:

Oversee the occupational of the department of Housing and Community advancement and the department of Economic and Workforce Development

Hire and also fire the director of these departments, v no involvement native the mayor

Make references to the plank of Supervisors on even if it is to approve, disapprove or amend breakthrough agreements negotiated by the department of Economic and Workforce advancement and agreements about the conveyances of surplus land

Adopt rule to create competitive bidding processes for the advancement of affordable housing

Review alters to inclusionary housing requirements and also make recommendations regarding those changes

Adopt a strategic arrangement that outlines the city’s purposes for affordable housing and also community development projects, consisting of the city’s plans to prioritize investments in communities with the highest needs because that affordable housing and community development

This measure also contains two “poison pills” that would void two various other measures showing up on the November ballot: Prop. U, which boosts the qualifying incomes for residents of inclusionary rental housing, and also Prop. P, i beg your pardon creates needs to administer existing bidding processes for affordable housing. If this charter amendment passes, the plank of Supervisors could pass regulation that would supersede the income definitions in Prop. U. Additionally, the rules embraced by the commission about competitive bidding would supersede the regulations characterized in Prop. P.


Attacks on the City Charter’s Balance the Powers:

PROPOSITIONS D, H, L and M

The distribution of strength in san Francisco government is characterized by that is City Charter, the city’s constitution. In 1995, after years of work by neurosoup.org and also others, the voters embraced a new charter to replace the vault one, indigenous 1932. End time, the 1932 charter had come to be outdated and overly complex, with numerous incremental changes.* The main purpose of the 1995 charter reform to be to lay the end clear present of authority, responsibility and also accountability between the commissions, the supervisors and also the mayor to allow the city come act quickly and decisively as demands arose and to allow citizens come hold elected leaders accountable.

Ever due to the fact that the 1995 charter passed, there have actually been piecemeal move to chip far at the definition of roles, in specific to undermine the office of the mayor. The latest advertisement hoc initiatives are the four charter amendments on this ballot that eliminate power from the office of the mayor and redistribute it come supervisors and also newly proposed positions. These measures would develop a windy advocate place (Prop. H), split appointments to the SFMTA board between the mayor and the supervisors (Prop. L), placed the management of two departments under a commission fairly than the straight oversight that the market (Prop. M) and prevent a mayoral appointee to the board of Supervisors from completing a term and also standing for re-election (Prop. D).

neurosoup.org is involved by this piecemeal strikes on the City Charter and the absence of publicly input involved. Alters to mountain Francisco’s device of federal government ought to be undertaken inclusively and also comprehensively, notified by a collection of principles. Props D, H, L and M reflect political motivations and should no be anchored in the city’s guiding document.

*San Francisco pick Committee ~ above Charter Reform documents (SFH 32), san Francisco history Center, san Francisco publicly Library


The Backstory

In mountain Francisco, the mayor hires, fires or selects from among nominees the directors of virtually every major department in the city, consisting of the department of windy Health, the department of windy Works, the san Francisco Municipal transportation Agency, the planning Department, the Recreation and Parks Department and also the department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing. The mayor likewise has the authority to hire and also fire the directors of the Mayor’s Office of Housing and also Community advancement and the Office that Economic and also Workforce Development. Under many of the city’s commissions, the market selects a department head from three candidates figured out by the commission.

Under this measure, the market would have no formal say in that is appointed to command the change the name departments of Housing and also Community advancement and Economic and also Workforce Development. This would make these departments really unusual in ~ the city’s government structure.

One the the key purposes of Prop. M is its 2 poison pill provisions, which would counteract Prop. U and Prop. P, initiative ordinances that aim to regulate exactly how affordable housing units space built and occupied.

This measure up was inserted on the ballot through a 6 come 5 vote of the plank of Supervisors. Together a charter amendment, it have to be ~ above the ballot and also requires a simple majority (50 percent to add one vote) come pass.

Pros

Prop. M’s mandate for a brand-new strategic setup for housing and community breakthrough could aid the city prioritize sources for these tasks through a publicly vetted process. Neurosoup.org believes strategy plans are vital to well-functioning agencies.

Cons

This measure would certainly not provide new services for mountain Franciscans and also would be likely to slow-moving down and increase prices for two of the city’s most urgent functions: affordable housing and also economic development. The new commission would certainly establish brand-new rules, regulations and procedures that can make the harder for the departments to negotiate advance agreements and disperse funding. This would an outcome in delays in the development of affordable housing.

Placing the departments that carry out this occupational under a brand-new commission and also removing the mayor’s capacity to appoint the department directors would weaken the mayor’s volume to control those departments and also make the harder because that the departments to role effectively.

This the supervisory board would cause confusion and reduce accountability by an altering San Francisco’s administration structure from one wherein appointment and also management duty is distributed plainly between the executive and legislative branches come one where monitoring responsibility is diffuse.

This measure would inexplicably placed two really different species of features — economic development and real estate — under a single commission. It also would no require any type of member of the commission to have expertise in financial development. Necessary city attributes that are right now performed by the Office the Economic and also Workforce development — such as little business support, job training and also emergency disaster relief loans to companies — would be put at risk. Effectively, this measure up would location economic advance under a real estate commission’s purview, law a good disservice to both an important functions.


Prop. M could delay the work-related of 2 of mountain Francisco’s most critical city agencies, those responsible for creating affordable housing and also leading economic development initiatives. The nature of this job-related — i m sorry requires complex coordination throughout many city agencies — requires the director of these departments to it is in close to and also speak because that the chief executive of the city. By remove the direct link with the market and including an ill-fitting class of bureaucracy, Prop. M would certainly make the more challenging for the city come execute the significant plans that produce affordable housing, administer jobs and revitalize neighborhoods.

See more: Giao Xu Duc Me Hang Cuu Giup, Giáo Xứ Đức Mẹ Hằng Cứu Giúp Garland

While publicly commission meetings would rise the formal methods for public input top top the city’s housing and also economic breakthrough efforts, there is no evidence that existing methods for public input space insufficient. And also a strategic arrangement could have actually been undertaken without creating a new commission. This measure up is unnecessary and also potentially really damaging come the city’s capability to execute planning, support economic advance and construct affordable housing.